Lithium-Ion Battery Class Action Settlement – If you’ve Bought a Laptop, Power Tool, Camcorder or More since 2000 You May Have Money Due To You

 

If you purchased a laptop, camcorder, cordless power tool or other items that contain lithium-ion batteries since 2000, you may be entitled to a cash payment from the class action settlement.

“The Class includes all persons and entities who, as residents of the United States and during the period from January 1, 2000 through May 31, 2011, indirectly purchased new for their own use and not for resale one of the following products which contained a lithium-ion cylindrical battery manufactured by one or more Defendants in this lawsuit or their co-conspirators: (i) a portable computer, (ii) a power tool, (iii) a camcorder, or (iv) a replacement battery for any of these products.”

To be eligible for benefits from this class action settlement, the consumer must have purchased the product from someone other than the manufacturer, such as a retailer.

DOES NOT STATE A PROOF OF PURCHASE IS NEEDED

FILE A CLAIM HERE

Deadline to File is 11/29/2017

Print HOT Coupons Here —>> Printable Coupons

Get Cheap/FREE Clothes —>> Schoola

All WYD Groups

HOT Cash Back Apps – Join Now!!

ibotta | Checkout 51 | Shrink | Ebates |ShopKick

OH NO!!! HATCHIMALS Class Action Lawsuit – Read About It Here & Share With Family/Friends

Did you snag one of these HOT HOT toys of 2016? This toy was a HUGE hit this past Holiday Season, many retailers sold out of and people were selling it at outrageous prices. Well now it looks like we have a class action lawsuit on them. Find out all the details here. Share this will all your friends/family that may have bought this toy.

hatchimals

Continue to follow along for more information and how you can file a claim

Spin Master Corp. engaged in a bait and switch marketing scheme to convince parents and children that the Hatchimals interactive stuffed animal was the “it” gift of the 2016 Christmas season, according to a class action lawsuit filed last week in California federal court.

“Christmas is a time for family, religion, and for millions of eager children around the world, a time for presents,” plaintiff Jodie Hejduk says in the Hatchimals class action lawsuit. “Across the world, corporations and manufacturers clamor to produce the ‘it’ gift item of the season.”

Corporations that are successful in developing, manufacturing, producing and selling the season’s “it” gift often experience “a Christmas miracle in the form of millions, or potentially billions, of dollars,” the Hatchimals class action lawsuit states.

Hatchimals were reportedly highly coveted by children over the 2016 holiday season. The interactive stuffed animal is meant to “hatch” out of the colorful egg in which they are sold, bringing joy to children who are excited to find out what is inside.

According to the Hatchimals class action lawsuit, Spin Master launched the Hatchimals toy in October, providing plenty of time to generate consumer excitement before the holiday season. By November, the toys were sold out in many locations, leading to a black market for Hatchimals.

The toys were sold at a retail price of $50 to $60, but Hatchimals on the black market were selling for around $350, the Hatchimals class action lawsuit alleges.

Hejduk claims Spin Master engaged in a “brilliant” marketing campaign when it launched the Hatchimals toy. However, despite the toy company’s representations, many of the Hatchimals stuffed animals failed to “hatch” out of their eggs, which is one of the toy’s primary draws.

The false advertising class action lawsuit states that the Hatchimal’s packaging, instructions and the company website all indicate that it will take a total of up to 20 to 25 minutes for a Hatchimal to hatch out of the egg.

The Hatchimals class action lawsuit points to numerous online complaints from consumers who claim their Hatchimal failed to hatch despite following the instructions. At least one consumer reported breaking the shell to extract the Hatchimal, only to find that the batteries contained inside were dead. Once the batteries were replaced, the toy functioned as advertised, but the child was deprived of the anticipated “hatching” experience.

Hejduk says Spin Master took a “few token remedial measures” to address the issue, but they were ineffective. She says the company should have either volunteered to recall the product or offer reimbursements to consumers who purchased the defective Hatchimals product.

“This action is brought on behalf of millions throughout this country—for the dutiful parents who waited hours and days outside retail stores, the children who cried tears of joy upon unwrapping their very own Hatchimal, and the American consumer who places faith and trust that they are purchasing products that work for those they love the most,” the Hatchimals class action lawsuit says.

The Hatchimals class action lawsuit asserts violations of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law. It also brings claims for unjust enrichment, breach of express warranty and injunctive relief.

Hejduk is represented by Mark J. Geragos, Ben J. Meiselas and Eric Y. Hahn of Geragos & Geragos APC and Lori G. Feldman, Andrea Clisura, Courtney E. Maccarone and Justin G. Sherman of Levi & Korinsky LLP.

The Hatchimals Class Action Lawsuit is Jodie Hejduk v. Spin Master Corp., et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-00093, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.

 

These Coupons Will Be Gone Soon – Print NOW — HOT Printable Coupons

Print HOT Coupons Here —>>  Printable Coupons

Get FREE Clothes —>> Schoola

All WYD Groups

HOT Cash Back Apps – Join Now!!

ibotta | Checkout 51 | Ebates  | ShopKick |  Shopmium REF # GMYMACTH

Class Action Lawsuit – If You’ve Purchased Milk Products from 2003 to Present then You MUST Read This

milk

 

This is a MUST read for anyone that has purchased mlk products.

There is a class action lawsuit for price fixing of fresh milk products. If you purchased milk or other fresh milk products (including cream, half & half, yogurt, cottage cheese, cream cheese, or sour cream) while a resident of Arizona, California, the District of Columbia, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, or Wisconsin during the period of 2003 to the present for your own use and not for resale, you may be eligible for cash benefits from a settlement reached in antitrust litigation currently pending in federal court. For class members to ensure cash payment, you must file a claim online by January 31, 2017.

Submit your claim here, no proof required —>>> Bought Milk

 

Print HOT Coupons Here —>>  Printable Coupons

Get FREE Clothes —>> Schoola

All WYD Groups

HOT Cash Back Apps – Join Now!!

ibotta | Checkout 51 | Ebates  | ShopKick |  Shopmium REF # GMYMACTH

Have You Used Johnson & Johnson Bedtime Products? If So Click This Link and Get in On This Class Action Lawsuit Then Share With Your Friends!|#deals #couponing #savingmoney #couponcommunity #coupondeals #linlinsavesyoumoney

Looks Like There is a Johnson & Johnson Bedtime bath Class action lawsuit going on.

They claimed that if you used their products that your child would fall asleep sooner, turns out this wasnt true in a lot of caases!

johnson

 

Here’s The Details:

Johnson & Johnson settlement Class Members include all consumers who bought one or more of the following “bedtime” products within the U.S., the District of Columbia or any U.S. territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam and the Virgin Islands between July 1, 2010 and Aug. 31, 2016:

  • JOHNSON’S® BEDTIME® Baby Bath
  • JOHNSON’S® BEDTIME® Baby Lotion
  • JOHNSON’S® BEDTIME® Baby Moisture Wash
  • JOHNSON’S® Baby BEDTIME® Washcloths
  • JOHNSON’S® BEDTIME® Baby Bubble Bath & Wash

The covered products must have been labeled (or advertised) as “clinically proven” to help a baby sleep better or to be used as part of a “bedtime” and/or “nighttime” routine.

Estimated Amount

up to $30

The amount you receive will be based on the number of valid claims

Proof of Purchase

No

Case Name

Stephanie Leiner v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc.,
Case No. 1:15-cv-05876
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Case Summary

The plaintiffs say they bought the bedtime products and followed “the 3-step nightly routine” recommended by Johnson & Johnson “for a period of time” with their children, but the personal care items “did not help [their] babies sleep any better.”

According to the class action lawsuits, Johnson & Johnson “knew or should have known, at the time it began selling the products, that there are no studies showing that the bedtime products are clinically proven to provide any results and [Johnson & Johnson] has no basis to make the claims about its products.”

Johnson & Johnson strongly denied all of the allegations but agreed to settle the class action lawsuits to avoid the cost and burden of ongoing litigation.

Settlement Pool

$5,000,000

Deadline

04/28/2017

Contact

Baby Bedtime Settlement
c/o Dahl Administration
P.O. Box 3614
Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614
Toll Free: 1-855-271-7182
Fax: 1-952-955-4589

New Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Sour Patch For Over Sized Packaging! |#deals #couponing #couponfamily #couponcommunity #coupondeals #linlinsavesyoumoney

WHOA Are you getting less bang for your buck with Sour Patch?!

screenshot

According to the Sour Patch Kids class action lawsuit, plaintiff Jose Izquierdo paid $4.29 for a package of Sour Patch Watermelon candy at an AMC movie theater in New York.

The candy was packaged in a transparent plastic pouch that was inside a non-transparent cardboard box that allegedly concealed the amount of product the box contained.

Izquierdo asserts that this style of packaging is deceptive and designed to disguise the fact that there is excessive empty space within the box.

According to the Sour Patch Kids class action lawsuit, this empty space amounts to non-functional slack-fill that is prohibited by the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).

The FDCA states that a food product can be considered misbranded if it is packaged in an opaque container that contains empty space that serves no function, such as protecting the product from damage.

The Sour Patch Watermelon class action lawsuit states that the non-transparent box has the capacity to hold at least 50 pieces of candy.

However, the 3.5-ounce package of Sour Patch Watermelon reportedly contains only 28 pieces of candy, or 56 percent of the container’s actual capacity. Based on this calculation, the Sour Patch Watermelon package contains non-functional slack-fill amounting to 44 percent of its actual capacity.

The Sour Patch Watermelon class action lawsuit alleges that Mondelez purposely chooses the oversize packaging to maximize the product’s shelf presence, helping it stand out from competing candy products.

Even though the Sour Patch Watermelon packaging indicates the weight of the candy contents, the slack-fill class action lawsuit asserts that this label does not prevent consumers from being misled by the product’s oversize packaging.

The Sour Patch class action lawsuit asserts violations of New York’s Deceptive Acts or Practices Law, negligent misrepresentation, common law fraud and unjust enrichment. Izquierdo seeks an injunction and damages.

Head Here for all the details

Stay Tuned to WhatsYourDeal for updates on Class Action Lawsuits!

DO NOT Miss out on THESE HOT EXPIRING Coupons!! CLICK HERE to get yours NOW

Looking for some Hot Printable Coupons look no further just click the highlighted words and your there!

Get to Saving Even More Money Join Find & Save TODAY Use Code: 6R2S and get a special savings when you sign up!!!!


Printable Coupons| WYD fan page|ShopYourWay |Join me on TSU|Checkout51 

WOW Look at These AMAZING Pieces of Jewelry and SUPER CHEAP as well You Better get these while you can! use code REWARD15 to save even more

Do You love AVON? if so hurry on over here and get some Great Deals!

ATTENTION!!! Class Action Lawsuit Targets P&G’s Old Spice Deodorant! Find Out Why! | #ClassActionLawsuit #OldSpiceDeodorant #InTheNews #CouponCommunity

OUCH! It seems as if MANY people around the country are dealing with this issue and don’t know why. Well, if you know someone that is dealing with this issue, then maybe this is the reason why and they need to get in contact with Procter & Gamble. Check this HORRIBLE news out!

Old Spice Class Action Lawsuit

Procter & Gamble’s Old Spice deodorant has caused severe rashes and chemical burns to possibly thousands of “unsuspecting consumers,” according to a class-action lawsuit filed this month that seeks more than $5 million in damages.

The lawsuit names 13 Old Spice products – among them, Old Spice Lionpride and Arctic Force High Endurance deodorants – that it says have affected “hundreds, if not thousands, of consumers.”

According to the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Columbus, there have been hundreds of online complaints about the products.

“In addition to blog complaints, YouTube features numerous videos also documenting armpit irritation, rash(es) and burning caused by Old Spice deodorant,” the lawsuit states. “Indeed, the problem is rampant, and rather than acknowledge the serious issue, Defendant is concealing it, in order to continue selling the product and reap windfall profits.”

A spokesman for Procter & Gamble, Damon Jones, said the products are safe to use. The problems a small number of consumers are experiencing are not chemical burns, Jones said, but skin reactions that can be caused by a range of factors or ingredients, such as alcohol or fragrance. The complaints posted online, Jones said, are not exclusive to Old Spice.

“We go to great lengths to ensure our products are safe to use, and tens of millions of men use this product with confidence and without incident every year,” Jones said in a statement. “A small number of men may experience irritation due to alcohol sensitivity, a common ingredient across virtually all deodorant products. For men who have experienced a reaction to a deodorant, an antiperspirant may be a better option because they have a different formulation.”

A 2008 study, posted on the website for the National Center for Biotechnology Information, said compounds in most deodorants and antiperspirants “have the potential to cause irritant and allergic reactions in many consumers.”

The lawsuit says the Old Spice products are defective, and that the people affected have used other deodorants without experiencing burning, rashes or discomfort.

Jones said any Old Spice user who has questions can call 1-800-677-7582.

Read The FULL Article HERE!

More information on this class action lawsuit HERE!

Stay tuned to What’s Your Deal while we bring you the most current and up-to-date information regarding this class action lawsuit and other IMPORTANT information!


Print More Money Saving Coupons HERE

  • Follow Me On Twitter @NoahNMaxxsMommy
  • Have Instagram & SnapChat? Add Me @QponMommyof2
  • Don’t have an Ibotta team yet… Join my team HERE!!!
  • Don’t have Snap yet… Join HERE!!!
  • Don’t have ShopKick yet… Join HERE!
  • Don’t have Check Points yet… Join HERE!
    ***(Enter Bonus Code: qponmommyof2)
  • Don’t have Shrink yet… Join HERE!
    ***(Enter Referral Code: AAGCNA)

100% All Natural Stevia in The Raw… I think Not! Check Out This Class Action Lawsuit Against Stevia for Their FALSE Claims!|#deals #couponing #couponcommunity #couponfamily #coupondeals #linlinsavesyoumoney

This Class Action Lawsuit is for Any U.S. Resident that Purchased Stevia in the raw that had the labeling “natural,” “all natural” or “100% natural.”

Screenshot

You Will get Aproxamitely $16 and NO Proof of Purchase is required

This Class Action Lawsuit Alleges that Defendant profited enormously by claiming their product was 100% Natural when in fact it was not.

When in fact it contained dextrose and maltodextrin a highly processed byproduct of GMO corn, the plaintiffs allege that they unnecessarily paid additional money for a product that was not in fact “all natural”.

The defendant denies the allegations but has agreed to settle to avoid the uncertainty and expenses associated to a long trial.

Settlement Pool

$1,500,000

Settlement Website

Stevia In The Raw Class Action Settlement

Deadline

06/06/2016


OMGOODNESSSSSS Victoria Secret Secret Rewards is BACK!!!!

Hurry and Print some money saving coupons HERE

If you don’t Want any of the coupons Simply un-clip anything you don’t want.

OH NO DID YOU READ THIS? These Are Now BANNED in the USA

WOW Look at These AMAZING Pieces of Jewelry and SUPER CHEAP as well You Better get these while you can! use code REWARD15 to save even more

Do You love AVON? if so hurry on over here and get some Great Deals!
Printable Coupons
| WYD fan page|ShopYourWay |Join me on TSU|Checkout51 

Did You Get Text Messages From Abercrombie?…If So Check Out This Abercrombie Class Action Settlement!|#deals #couponing #couponcommunity #couponfamily #coupondeals #linlinsavesyoumoney

I was looking into some class action suits today and this Abercrombie one caught my eye!

abercrombie

If you received ANY unwanted text from Abercrombie then YOU are eligible

You have until 5/15/2016 to file your claim!

Class Eligibility

You are a member of the class if you received one or more text messages sent either by or on behalf of Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Hollister Co., Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Gilly Hicks and/or abercrombie kids from Aug. 25, 2010 through Dec. 18, 2015.

Settlement amount

Varies

The settlement pool minus attorney’s fees and administration expenses will be divided in equal parts among qualified class members.

Proof of Purchase

Cell #

The lawsuit resolves allegations that Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and its subsidiaries violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without their consent.

The defendant denies the allegations but has agreed to settle to avoid the uncertainty and expenses associated to a long trial.

 

Did You Take Pradaxa If So This Information on This Class Action Lawsuit is For You!|

Screenshot

The blood thinning medication Pradaxa is one of the top selling drugs in the United States due to its ability to effectively prevent patients with abnormal heart rhythms, such as atrial fibrillation, from suffering strokes and blood clots.

Pradaxa has been in the news lately though not for its stroke-preventing abilities, but due to the multiplePradaxa lawsuits filed by individuals who have suffered from a catastrophic bleeding event after taking the prescription drugs

Screenshot

Pradaxa and Atrial Fibrillation

Patients who suffer from non-valvular atrial fibrillation are at risk of suffering from blood clots and strokes because atrial fibrillation lessens the heart’s beating efficiency, leading to the blood’s pooling in the heart’s atria, or its upper chambers. The pooling of blood can produce a blood clot.

A blot clot that breaks loose and travels from the atria through the blood stream to the brain can cause a stroke, or can get stuck in a blood vessel and prevent blood from reaching a portion of the brain. Since oxygen is necessary for the survival of all of our body’s tissues, cells in that portion of the brain deprived of oxygen-carrying blood begin to die within minutes.

The anticoagulant medicine Pradaxa is intended to reduce those risks.

Pradaxa (dabigatran) was approved by the FDA in 2010 and was quickly found to have possibly caused a multitude of serious, and possibly life threatening injuries. The Pradaxa Internal Bleeding Class Action Lawsuit Investigation is actively researching claims from consumers that were possibly injured by Pradaxa.

If you or a loved one experienced any of the following complications after taking Pradaxa, you may have a legal claim:

  • Internal bleeding
  • Kidney bleeding
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Heart attack
  • Stroke
  • Brain hemorrhage
  • Death

Pradaxa Lawsuits

According to Pradaxa lawsuits filed against drug maker Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer allegedly knew that taking the drug could lead to a possible risk of patients seriously bleeding, but the manufacturer failed to warn individuals of the allegedly defective and dangerous nature of the drug.

In May 2014, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals announced that it would settle 4,000 Pradaxa lawsuits for an unprecedented $650 million.

Although Boehringer Ingelheim agreed to settle those thousands of Pradaxa lawsuits, the drug maker is still facing thousands more in federal court, alleging that users suffered severe and sometimes fatal bleeding problems after using the controversial anticoagulant.

There are over 2,600 Pradaxa lawsuits currently consolidated in a multidistrict litigation known as In re: Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2385, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

If you or a loved one have suffered from uncontrolled bleeding, hemorrhaging, gastrointestinal bleeds, fatalities, or other side effects after taking Pradaxa, you may be able to file a Pradaxa lawsuit against Boehringer Ingelheim.

In general, Pradaxa lawsuits are filed individually by each plaintiff and are not class actions.

If you or a loved one had any of these Serious conditions OR You took Pradaxa and want to have an evaluation Go HERE and fill out the form on the right hand side of the page to join this lawsuit.

info from topclassactionsuits


 

Here are the preclipped High Dollar printable coupons Available.

If you don’t Want any of the coupons Simply un-clip anything you don’t want.

Do NOT Forget to Get Prepared for Victoria Secrets Secret Rewards

WOW Look at These AMAZING Pieces of Jewelry and SUPER CHEAP as well You Better get these while you can! use code REWARD15 to save even more

Do You love AVON? if so hurry on over here and get some Great Deals!
Printable Coupons
| WYD fan page|ShopYourWay |Join me on TSU|Checkout51 

Tincup Whiskey Class action|#deals #couponing #couponcommunity #couponfamily #couponfam

Screenshot

This settlement includes anyone in the United States who purchased Tincup Whiskey from July 1, 2013 through Sept. 16, 2015.

Estimated Amount

Up to $27

  • $4.50 per bottle of Tincup Whiskey with proof of purchase for up to six bottles
  • $2.25 per bottle of Tincup Whiskey without proof of purchase for up to six bottles
  • $0.75 per each class of whiskey purchased at a restaurant or bar for up to five glasses.

NO PROOF OF PURCHASE REQUIRED

FILE A CLAIM HERE: Tincup Whiskey Claim Form

Case Name:

Aliano et al. v. Proximo Spirts, Inc,
Case No. 2014-CH-17429
Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois.

SUMMARY OF CASE:

This settlement resolves resolves allegations that the whiskey was deceptively marketed as being made in Colorado when it is actually made in Indiana.

Proximo Spirits does not admit to any wrongdoing but has agreed to this class action settlement to avoid the cost and risk of going to trial

SETTLEMENT POOL

$425,000

MUST FILE BY: 11/17/2015

CONTACT:

Tincup Whiskey Settlement
c/o Dahl Administration
PO Box 3614
Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614
info@TincupWhiskeySettlement.com
(877) 864-0646

Printable Coupons| WYD fan page|ShopYourWay |Join me on TSU|Checkout51


Dinner time FAST!!! Treasure Chest Dealz Inserts


Looking for a nice Gift for someone special? Check out these Glow in the Dark Anklets, Necklaces, and Bracelets~use code REWARD15 to save even more